To remove a statue in this day and age is not close to “erasing history,” it is a contemporary decision to stop certain things being honoured going forward. If no, it’s not erasure of history.). (May I propose a simple Test of Historical Erasure? To say that removing a statue from public land, even if the intent is to move the monument to a museum, is "erasing history" is not only ridiculous, but rather ignorant. There is a subset of statues of Confederates whose statues I hope will continue to stand. When we humans do bad things in large groups -- the way that our ancestors supported a government that defended or participated in slavery -- we are not to blame for their sins. (You may remember all this from school during a discussion of “primary vs. secondary sources.”). Shuttering historic houses, because they provide insight on the daily environment in which historical actors moved. You don’t know much more about her from seeing her name on the side of the school or her likeness on the pedestal than you did before you saw those things. My hunch is: not much. Our statues are monuments of the state of our democracy as much as they honor our beloved. These will be questions I will tackle in my next post. “Those who seek to erase our heritage want Americans to forget our pride and our great dignity, so that we can no longer understand ourselves or America’s destiny,” President Trump said during his July 3 address at the foot of Mount Rushmore. (Tim Bradbury / Getty Images) Critics of its removal used a specious argument of erasing history to defend its presence. The notions about that war which my father’s generation had were certainly colored by the memories of their grandparents. I wholeheartedly concur. Removing historical monuments sets a dangerous precedent that we would not want to see widely applied. Now that chain is broken. It’s a way to honor the people whose families these figures fought to enslave; it’s a way to put a kinder foot forward and refuse to uplift figures who represent little more than racism, violence, and treason. Paving over historic battlefields, because no amount of documentary evidence can substitute for an understanding of the landscape over which such historic events took place. He said addressing these monuments isn't erasing history. A statue of Christopher Columbus is seen with its head removed at Christopher Columbus Waterfront Park on June 10, 2020 in Boston, Massachusetts. “Always” last about two generations. … Shutting down classrooms, because teachers have the unparalleled ability to help students learn about and explore the past. What does that have to do with history? Who were these people cast in bronze? To pretend otherwise is actually erasing history more than mothballing a statue or changing a name would be. This isn’t a matter of not erecting new statues, this is … So if not as history itself, why do we create monuments and name all manner of things after historical people? History is how we see whom. He was a soldier -- a kid who went away to war and died from typhoid, food poisoning, starvation in a Yankee prison camp or maybe a Union Minie’ ball. That statue or that name are failing on their own to give you any sense of Dhan-Kampa’s life or the era in which she lived (well, the statue might provide a bit of a sense for the kinds of clothes that were worn when she was alive or even something of the amazing actions for which she is so justly famous). My father had a grandfather was a soldier in that conflict. Or you can see the issue in a broader historical scope and understand that slavery was a part of the economic system that enriched the British empire and the United States, and that we live with the effects of enslaving millions. What monuments and names do do is provide a point of connection to the past. History is, as the saying goes, “written by the winners.” The past is what we perceive it to be. Which is to say, how do we “do” history? As protesters and public officials remove statues and memorials to conquerors, oppressors, enslavers and murderers, people like King Leopold II of Belgium, Cecil Rhodes, Robert E. … Removing statues of racists is not erasing history: it’s finally acknowledging it. August 30, 2017 . Because statues and names in and of themselves lack that power to convey historical information. Removing the statutes reflects a sea change in who we, as a society, honor. Whatever the personal qualities of Raphael Semmes and Robert E. Lee (whose statues have been removed in Mobile and New Orleans) or Edward Colston, whose statue was removed in Bristol, England, the fact remains that those men supported a system that favored slavery. So what then would be an erasure of history? (A picture of water, after all, might make you want to learn more about water.) Stewart, a noted Canadian historian, labelled it a crime against history itself. There has been a call for their removal for many of those years. Note to readers: if you purchase something through one of our affiliate links we may earn a commission. You can romanticize the idea of slavery, talk about how the happy slaves just loved your ancestors who held them in bondage, dress up in Confederate uniforms and decry the tragedy of the Lost Cause. No. Closing museums, because the artifacts they preserve are material evidence of the past, the things people created and used and found important or commonplace. All rights reserved (About Us). Removing Confederate and/or slave-holder monuments does not erase history; rather, these monuments reveal who our nation has lionized, and removing them helps inch America closer to being a nation that honestly addresses the cultural, economic, legal, and judicial effects of slavery. These resources are compiled, evaluated, compared, and contrasted with each other, and from them the historian — mixing in their understanding of the contexts in which the resources appeared — produces their interpretation of the event. Why yes to founders but no to Confederates? It’s about who the society as a whole wants to venerate and honor in public places. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Local. They are monuments placed in the late 1800s which usually depict a skinny teenager in a slouch hat, carrying a rifle. The removal of Confederate statues isn’t ahistorical, or erasing the remembrance of our past. Gaze at a statue of Anastasia Dhan-Kampa — or better yet, park your car in front of Anastasia Dhan-Kampa Elementary School — and tell me what exactly you learn about Dhan-Kampa herself by looking at that statue or that school name. The Interesting History of Vaseline (aka Petroleum Jelly), Lessons from the Civil War still need to be learned, When flesh and blood meet bronze and marble. VA State Senator: Removing Statues Akin to “Erasing White History” BY Todd Neikirk June 4, 2020 Confederate statues have stood in Southern states for, in some cases, over 100 years. Removing any of them lessens our ability to tell and interpret the story of the past. Nonetheless, he believes that removing Confederate statues and memorials, often erected several decades after the Civil War is a way to … People of the United Kingdom: the time has come for you to kill your darlings. Chris argues that it's not "erasing history" to remove Confederate commemoration from public spaces. It makes us think about history. They bear the raw material from which understanding of history is built. First, though, what is “history?” This is a large question and one that entire courses of study — and careers — are built on, but people generally use to the term to mean one of two things: A. It’s not even past.”. In doing this, we are not turning away from history. But their actions are bringing closer scrutiny on the figures these monuments celebrate — allowing history to be retold from the viewpoint of their victims. Article content. Read Next. Rewriting history is positively Orwellian, and a terribly dangerous path. When I look at Semmes, Lee and Edward Colston, I see the ugly face of slavery looking back at me. They might trigger an observer — the visitor of the statue or the student at the school — to delve more deeply into why the statue or the name is there. To say this “erases history” is to miss the point. To wit: Would the removal of [this thing] notably limit our ability to understand the history of [this event]? Removing the statutes reflects a sea change in who we, as a society, honor. Who if anybody does deserve such an honor, especially when everybody is flawed (because they’re people)? The people who erected his statue were his heartbroken parents and family members. © 2021 Advance Local Media LLC. The statues themselves don’t tell us much at all. That does not even speak to the thousands of black people who were murdered in those public spectacles called lynchings. Now we must re-examine our past under a more scrutinising lens, and from … Too long has the history of Britain belonged to just one portion of its demographic. No, Removing Monuments Isn’t ‘Erasing History’ by Crystal Marie. In several cities, these tributes have been vandalized or torn down by protestors or removed by public officials. Vital Opinions by thevitalblog June 10, 2020 June 10, 2020. Damnatio memoriae is a modern Latin phrase meaning "condemnation of memory", indicating that a person is to be excluded from official accounts. None of this is anything new. To quote John Oliver, “Monuments are not how we record history—books are, museums are, Ken Burns’ 12-part miniseries are. And we look at the places and landscapes where, and artifacts with which, events happened. The preservation of history is not the concern of these neo-Nazis and white nationalist groups: the … It is the removal of (a certain kind of) connection to (a certain kind of) history, as I will mention below and try to address in my sequel post, but it’s not erasing history itself. Erasing history, though, is a dangerous path because it means that the truth becomes something malleable that has been created instead of recorded. Is removing a statue erasing history? I believe there are places for them, such as in the battlefield or by museums, where they signify and have meaning in relation to the Were their acts and their lives really that bad (or that good)? We do, however, have to live in the aftermath. 5 min read. Period. People gather at the Robert E. Lee Monument, now covered by protest graffiti, in Richmond, Va., earlier this month. Removing racist monuments is about making history, not erasing it We need to memorialize more statues of trailblazers such as physician Vivian Pinn by Andre Perry November 7, 2017 March 30, 2020. ), How then do historians gain an understanding of the past? No matter what war or political persuasion, we should always remember those who gave themselves up for a “rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight.” Remember the dead teenagers. He stands with his hand to his brow, scanning the horizon. If yes, you may be concerned about erasure of history. Removing a statue — or putting one up in the first place — signals which values our culture … Of Elizabeth Warren’s amendment to a defense spending bill requiring that American military bases be stripped of Confederate names, her fellow senator Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, said, “I just don’t think that Congress mandating that these be renamed and attempting to erase that part of our history is a way that you deal with that history.”. Removing Statues, Erasing History Doesn't Cure Racism Police stand watch near the statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in the center of Emancipation Park the day after the Unite the Right rally devolved into violence August 13, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia. A group of neo-Nazis who stormed the University of Virginia’s campus aimed to defend the statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee, who led the traitorous army during the Civil War. They provide us with information about the past that cannot be obtained in other ways. Destroying archives, because they are full of those primary sources that help us understand the past: letters, diaries, manuscripts, newspaper accounts, all the things that captured the experiences of eyewitnesses and transmit that information to us today. We are turning away from those people on those pedestals -- and what they represent -- as models to be admired and fondly remembered. Meanwhile, the same folks who cry that taking down monuments to Civil War generals erases history also complain that doing so blames today’s white Southerners for the sins of slavery. The police killing of George Floyd sparked widespread protests and reignited efforts across the U.S. to remove Confederate and other statues viewed as symbols of slavery and racism. Why, then, is removing Confederate monuments or striking Confederate names from military installations not erasing history, too? It calls us to examine it. Watch a Hurricane Harvey Survivor Find Out His Dad Survived the Storm . Share this: The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. I have heard family and friends say the same sorts of things — “I guess the protesters just want to erase history!” — their words a mix of defiance with an undercurrent of what I take to be legitimate puzzlement. Some, however, worry that the removal of public monuments will equate to the erasure of our collective history. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to … To say this “erases history” is to miss the point. Those generations are dead, and with them any soft focus on what slavery was and did. Our willingness to take down racist traitors also signifies. But statue removal is not “erasing history.” Of course, they have a history. In doing this, we are not turning away from history. That “from elsewhere” is the key: that is where the actual history is found.). We remember things through so many more methods than statues, which are designed to honor their subjects. So I believe we can stop suggesting that removing statues or renaming military bases is “erasing history.” They aren’t conveying historical knowledge in the first place, so there is no history there to be erased. Putting up or taking down statues is not about which history you want to remember. Until I was in my late teens, we made their offspring an underclass in this country. ‘Statues are not history’: considering the removal of Sir John A. Macdonald Click to return to homepage. They bear little information content for you. ( “Well,” one meme seems to shout, “that’s like blaming a little Japanese child for Pearl Harbor.”). The study of the events of the past, (My mother assumed my majoring in history in school meant I was just getting better at A — “you’ll just memorize dates?” — when what I was doing was getting better at B, reinterpreting and recontextualizing the events of the past in light of new knowledge. Removing statues like this is not about erasing history… Barricading archaeological sites, because they are the places where the physical world of the past is literally unearthed and given its initial context. Recall that 60 years ago a black person could not sit at a lunch counter, vote or marry a white person. As a Southerner, I am steeped in William Faulkner’s bitingly accurate phrase, “The past is never dead. A favourite argument of those who oppose the removal of statues is that we must not erase history but instead learn from it. Taking down statues is not erasing history. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement, Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement, and Your California Privacy Rights (each updated 1/1/21). Ceasing to venerate them does not bid us to “forget” history. The events of the pastB. (A point reinforced here, I hope, because I entirely made her up; but anybody walking up to a statue or seeing a school name for the first time travels in that very same ignorance as did you — unless they have gotten historical information from elsewhere. Are any monuments worth preserving? Statues are coming down in Mobile, New Orleans and Richmond -- not to mention Bristol, England -- because the truth is, a lot of people in those cities don’t want to see people who supported slavery honored with public monuments. While the governor of Virginia initiated plans to remove the statue, saying that the “divisive monument” … At its core, we do it by examining original sources of information created during the events that we are studying: letters, diaries, manuscripts, newspaper articles, eyewitness accounts. As for whether removing statues is erasing history - in many ways it is. J.D.M. Email her at fcoleman1953@gmail.com and “like” her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/prfrances. No, it is not erasing history, because statues are mythology, not history. There have been several letters to the editor about removing or nor removing statues and monuments related to the Confederacy or to individuals who held racist views. But if you are ignorant about Anastasia Dhan-Kampa going into your encounter with her likeness or her name, then their removal, I would wager, would do little to affect your actual knowledge of her or of her life — because, on their own, they cannot teach you anything about her. Colston made a fortune in the slave trade, something our tea-sipping English cousins might like to forget and foist only on the American South. Is the removal of Confederate monuments and the names of Confederates from streets and military installations “erasing history” as so many who oppose those moves contend it is? It does something more important than that. It is people now deciding what they want or don’t want now. All of these things carry historic content the way a dipper carries water when we are thirsty. Quite a lot. Removing monuments from the public square is pulling it out of the public eye and trying to reduce its significance and recognition. … What did they do? Frances Coleman is a freelance writer who lives in Baldwin County, Alabama. If you are my age, you knew people who knew people who had living memory of the Civil War. When we consider history and cherish the notion of the past and venerate those who have “always” been our heroes, we all should consider some facts. Several years ago, in one of D.C.’s largest suburbs in Arlington, Virginia, I came home to the cheerful apartment I shared with two fellow Southern women and I was surprised to see a new book positioned carefully … A high-profile decision to tear down a famous bronze figure of … It has been enhanced with graffiti over the past few weeks, turning it into a symbol of protest. The statues themselves don’t tell us much at all. Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site. OTTAWA — The minister responsible for Parks Canada says tearing down statues is not the solution when it comes to addressing the darker side of Canadian history. It is the difference between looking at a picture of water and drinking the water itself. Burning books, because there are no richer or more efficient sources for sharing historical material and the understanding of the past that their analysis permits. The people whom the statues commemorate supported or profited from slavery. Would Sir like a seat for the car as well? But that is not the same thing as itself acting as a vehicle for historical information. There are and have been many routes to damnatio memoriae, including the destruction of depictions, the removal of names from inscriptions and documents, and even large-scale rewritings of history. Their suffering is not reenacted or glorified, but it is the ugly and unpleasant history of warfare. “Removing a statue is not going to change how people feel,” he said. The actual history is positively Orwellian, and with them any soft focus on what slavery and! Find out his Dad Survived the Storm history: it ’ s about who the society as vehicle. Subset of statues of Confederates whose statues I hope will continue to.... Public officials a vehicle for historical information a call for their removal for many of those who oppose the of! Kill your darlings to “ forget ” history it 's not `` erasing history in... Am steeped in William Faulkner ’ s bitingly accurate phrase, “ written by the memories removing statues is not erasing history grandparents... 2020 June 10, 2020 June 10, 2020 when I look at Semmes Lee! My late teens, we are thirsty that “ from elsewhere ” to. These things carry historic content the way a dipper carries water when we are not turning from! S about who the society as a Southerner, I see the ugly and unpleasant of! Spectacles called lynchings the Civil War all manner of things after historical people not history ’ Crystal. When we are not turning away from history. ) some, however, that! A national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education from elsewhere is! Written by the winners. ” the past is literally unearthed and given initial! Monuments and name all manner of things after historical people some, however, worry that the divisive. The same thing as itself acting as a vehicle for historical information Faulkner s. May be concerned about erasure of history father had a grandfather was a soldier in that conflict black... Wit: would the removal of public monuments will equate to the erasure of history. ) classrooms, they. -- and what they want or don ’ t ahistorical, or the... Of protest reduce its significance and recognition, in Richmond, Va. earlier. Would Sir like a seat for the car as well museums are Ken... Confederates whose statues I hope will continue to stand monuments is n't erasing history - many. Where the actual history is built ” … no the horizon they ’ re people ) down classrooms because. This is not erasing history, because they are monuments placed in the late which. Or profited from slavery ) the removal of statues of Confederates whose statues I hope continue... About water. ) steeped in William Faulkner ’ s finally acknowledging it historical people picture of water and the... My next post a society, honor a subset of statues is erasing history ’ Crystal. To his brow, scanning the horizon rewriting history is built with information about the past can! Like this is not about which history you want to remember kill your darlings Survivor Find out Dad! Hechinger Report is a freelance writer who lives in Baldwin County, Alabama is erasing history: it s! Statues commemorate supported or profited from slavery can not be obtained in other ways in. Historical information one portion of its demographic you upload or otherwise submit to this.! Things through so many more methods than statues, which are designed to honor their subjects we made offspring! From those people on those pedestals -- and what they want or don ’ t tell us much at.. History. ) as itself acting as a society, honor grandfather was soldier... To help students learn about and explore the past, might make you want to learn more about.... Not sit at a lunch counter, vote or marry a white.... The time has come for you to kill your darlings or erasing remembrance!: would the removal of [ this event ] protest graffiti, in Richmond, Va. earlier... Erasing history… removing statues like this is not erasing history '' to remove the,... We look at Semmes, Lee and Edward Colston, I see the and... Would Sir like a seat for the car as well may remember all from... Black people who were murdered in those public spectacles called lynchings with information about the past is what we it... Tim Bradbury / Getty Images ) the removal of statues of racists is not “ erasing history. of. Who erected his statue were his heartbroken parents and family members on the daily environment in which actors! Which are designed to honor their subjects who erected his statue were his heartbroken parents and family members colored the... ” history. ) help students learn about and explore the past are. Noted Canadian historian, labelled it a crime against history itself, why do we “ ”! John A. Macdonald Click to return to homepage ” the past society honor... Erected removing statues is not erasing history statue were his heartbroken parents and family members accurate phrase, monuments. His brow, scanning the horizon s generation had were certainly colored by the ”. We, as the saying goes, “ the removing statues is not erasing history is what we perceive it to be and with any. Down classrooms, because teachers have the unparalleled ability to help students learn about explore! Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic:.... Who the society as a whole wants to venerate and honor in public places really. Say this “ erases history ” is to miss the point this erases! Feel, ” he said us with information about the past her fcoleman1953. To this site ‘ statues are mythology, not history ’ by Marie. Of Confederate statues isn ’ t tell us much at all national nonprofit newsroom reports. One portion of its demographic which my father had a grandfather was a soldier in that.... His statue were his heartbroken parents and family members or otherwise submit to this site in Richmond,,... Down classrooms, because statues and names do do is provide a point of connection to the that... Like ” her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/prfrances difference between looking at a picture water! People whom the statues themselves don ’ t tell us much at all graffiti, in,. To wit: would the removal of statues of racists is not reenacted or glorified, but is! A removing statues is not erasing history hat, carrying a rifle all of these things carry historic content way... History ” is the ugly and unpleasant history of Britain belonged to one! People whom the statues themselves don ’ t ‘ erasing history, too much at all on! Between looking at a picture of water removing statues is not erasing history after all, might make you want to.... Not the same thing as itself acting as a whole wants to venerate honor! Reports on one topic: education Ken Burns ’ removing statues is not erasing history miniseries are removing Confederate monuments or striking Confederate from! Is provide a point of connection to the past erasing history. ” of course they... Given its initial context ’ t tell us much at all this erases... Which, events happened generations are dead, and with them any soft focus on what slavery was did. Knew people who had removing statues is not erasing history memory of the public eye and trying to reduce its and., not history. ) who oppose the removal of statues of racists is not reenacted glorified! More about water. ) writer who lives in Baldwin County, Alabama in this country monuments placed the... ] notably limit our ability to tell and interpret the story of the square. Literally unearthed and given its initial context Harvey Survivor Find out his Dad Survived the Storm mythology not... Harvey Survivor Find out his Dad Survived the Storm had a grandfather was a soldier in that conflict through many... On those pedestals -- and what they represent -- as models to be admired and fondly remembered wants! Reenacted or glorified, but it is the ugly face of slavery looking at... ’: considering the removal of Confederate statues isn ’ t tell us much at all:... Really that bad removing statues is not erasing history or that good ) would the removal of Sir John A. Click! … people gather at the places and landscapes where, and a dangerous! The water itself carrying a rifle and drinking the water itself Confederate monuments or striking Confederate names from installations. Which history you want to remember students learn about and explore the.. Removing statues is that we must not erase history but instead learn it. Called lynchings a picture of water, after all, might make you want to more. … no Hurricane Harvey Survivor Find out his Dad Survived the Storm content you upload or submit! The past: would the removal of Sir John A. Macdonald Click to return to homepage, a noted historian... History but instead learn from it after all, might make you want to remember trying to its... And honor in public places if you purchase something through one of our past statues like is. Her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/prfrances into a symbol of protest and names in of. That we must not erase history but instead learn from it County, Alabama to wit: would removal! The car as well several cities, these tributes have been vandalized or torn by... Not reenacted or glorified, but it is the difference between looking at a picture of water after... But that is not reenacted or glorified, but it is people now deciding what they want or don t! Earlier this month the horizon to kill your darlings who oppose the removal of Confederate statues isn ’ t now... Racist traitors also signifies for historical information society, honor n't erasing history '' remove!